Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGACX
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$32.39
Change+$0.45 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.95
Change+$0.71 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LSGRX (17.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs LSGRX (0.00). LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LSGRX (34 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGACX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.87 vs. RGACX (20.14). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. RGACX (40.47).
| LSGRX | RGACX | LSGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.574 | 12.446 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 325B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.87 | 20.14 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.80 | 44.52 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.09 | 40.47 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.61 | 82.86 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement