Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGACX
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$34.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.53
Change+$0.69 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LSGRX (18.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs LSGRX (0.00). LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LSGRX (34 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGACX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.14 vs. RGACX (17.42). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.67 vs. RGACX (47.19).
| LSGRX | RGACX | LSGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.223 | 18.808 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 340B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.14 | 17.42 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.02 | 61.09 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.67 | 47.19 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.27 | 101.75 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement