Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGACX
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$34.44
Change+$0.32 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LSGRX (18.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs LSGRX (0.00). LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LSGRX (34 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.67). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGACX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.46 vs. RGACX (14.19). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.93 vs. RGACX (40.04).
| LSGRX | RGACX | LSGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.509 | 19.586 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 341B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.46 | 14.19 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.44 | 74.27 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.93 | 40.04 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.52 | 101.32 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement