Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGACX
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGACX
LSGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LSGRX (16.8B). LSGRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LSGRX (35 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.66). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGACX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. LSGRX (0.66). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 19.63 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| LSGRX | RGACX | LSGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.672 | 6.959 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 3.68 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.87 | 37.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.63 | 13.46 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.58 | 97.58 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement