Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGAGX
LSGRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGAGX
LSGRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LSGRX (16.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LSGRX (0.00). LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LSGRX (35 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LSGRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGAGX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. LSGRX (3.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. LSGRX (19.96).
| LSGRX | RGAGX | LSGRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.29 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.29 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.111 | 8.887 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 12.55 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.05 | 50.34 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 20.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.50 | 122.10 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement