Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSITX vs RGEBX
LSITX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSITX vs RGEBX
LSITX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSITX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSITX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LSITX (10.6B). LSITX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSITX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LSITX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LSITX (0.64). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSITX (22.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSITX: RGEBX (250) vs LSITX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.94 vs. LSITX (4.32). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.28 vs. LSITX (10.71).
| LSITX | RGEBX | LSITX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.705 | 10.227 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 338B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 13.94 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.62 | 50.06 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.71 | 21.28 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.63 | 103.93 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement