Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSITX vs RGEBX
LSITX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSITX vs RGEBX
LSITX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSITX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSITX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LSITX (9.84B). LSITX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSITX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LSITX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LSITX (0.64). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSITX (22.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSITX: RGEBX (250) vs LSITX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. LSITX (-1.13). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. LSITX (0.14).
| LSITX | RGEBX | LSITX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.816 | 6.888 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.84B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | 3.42 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.17 | 36.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.14 | 12.32 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.91 | 93.96 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement