Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSNGX (121M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSNGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.01). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSNGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. LSNGX (-1.45). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.69 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| LSNGX | NPFCX | LSNGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.47 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.176 | 4.931 | -125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.45 | 6.26 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.14 | 30.32 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.69 | 8.52 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers