Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs NPFCX
LSNGX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. NPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Buy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSNGX (118M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: LSNGX (9 years) vs NPFCX (26 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.01). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSNGX (12.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: NPFCX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. LSNGX (-8.41). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.68 vs. NPFCX (6.04).
| LSNGX | NPFCX | LSNGX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.47 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.47 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.770 | 6.030 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.41 | 2.83 | -297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.18 | 35.62 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.68 | 6.04 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement