Ad is loading...
LSOFX vs NLSCX
LSOFX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LSOFX vs NLSCX
LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class
Price$17.93
Change+$0.15 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.75M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
LSOFX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSOFX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSOFX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. LSOFX (189M). LSOFX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LSOFX (0.77) vs NLSCX (0.00). LSOFX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LSOFX (15 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). LSOFX (2.75) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX (48.00) and LSOFX (46.61) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSOFX: NLSCX (1000) vs LSOFX (5000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. LSOFX (0.76). LSOFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.02 vs. NLSCX (23.56).
| LSOFX | NLSCX | LSOFX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 2.43 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 2.43 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.200 | -0.735 | 299% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 7.13B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 4.28 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | 7.87 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.02 | 23.56 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.85 | 27.43 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...