Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXAX
LSPCX vs MBXAX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXAX
LSPCX vs MBXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LSPCX (74.2M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXAX: LSPCX (7.02) vs MBXAX (0.00). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXAX: LSPCX (13 years) vs MBXAX (11 years). LSPCX (4.24) is less costly to investors than MBXAX (2.25). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MBXAX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.88 vs. LSPCX (12.57). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.70 vs. LSPCX (19.90).
| LSPCX | MBXAX | LSPCX / MBXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.19 | 2.25 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.24 | 2.25 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.962 | 17.074 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.2M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 18.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.40 | 30.86 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.90 | 42.70 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.06 | 101.16 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement