Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. LSPCX (70.4M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: LSPCX (7.67) vs MBXIX (1.80). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.17 vs. MBXIX (0.37). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. LSPCX (33.49).
| LSPCX | MBXIX | LSPCX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 2.03 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 2.03 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.457 | 1.417 | 456% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 8.19B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.67 | 1.80 | 426% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 0.37 | 1,116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.48 | 11.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | 45.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement