Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXIX
LoCorr Spectrum Income C
Price$5.41
Change+$0.06 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.27M
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$40.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.37B
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXIX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Buy and MBXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.37B vs. LSPCX (70.3M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: LSPCX (7.56) vs MBXIX (1.82). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.60 vs. LSPCX (0.44). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.03 vs. LSPCX (38.71).
| LSPCX | MBXIX | LSPCX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 2.03 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 2.03 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.458 | 3.091 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.3M | 8.37B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.56 | 1.82 | 416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | 4.60 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | 7.18 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.71 | 49.03 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers