Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXIX
LoCorr Spectrum Income C
Price$5.58
Change-$0.04 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.79M
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$39.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.34B
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXIX commentary
Sep 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.34B vs. LSPCX (73.8M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: LSPCX (7.42) vs MBXIX (1.83). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXIX (48.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. LSPCX (5.12). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.75 vs. LSPCX (49.88).
| LSPCX | MBXIX | LSPCX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 2.03 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 2.03 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.997 | 2.524 | 317% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.8M | 8.34B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.42 | 1.83 | 406% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 6.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 12.71 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.88 | 52.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement