Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. LSPCX (74.2M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: LSPCX (7.02) vs MBXIX (0.00). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: LSPCX (13 years) vs MBXIX (11 years). LSPCX (4.24) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.00). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.19 vs. LSPCX (12.57). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. LSPCX (19.90).
| LSPCX | MBXIX | LSPCX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.19 | 2.00 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.24 | 2.00 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.962 | 17.304 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.2M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 19.19 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.40 | 31.85 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.90 | 44.55 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.06 | 106.32 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement