Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTUCX vs RMAGX
LTUCX vs RMAGX Comparison
Open Charts LTUCX vs RMAGX
LTUCX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTUCX vs. RMAGX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTUCX is a Hold and RMAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMAGX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. LTUCX (76.9M). RMAGX pays higher dividends than LTUCX: RMAGX (4.56) vs LTUCX (2.37). LTUCX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: LTUCX (32 years) vs RMAGX (16 years). LTUCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.26). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. LTUCX (22.17). RMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTUCX: RMAGX (250) vs LTUCX (5000). RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.98 vs. LTUCX (3.57). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.06 vs. LTUCX (2.14).
| LTUCX | RMAGX | LTUCX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.26 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.26 | 762% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.159 | -0.184 | -87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.9M | 13.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 4.56 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 4.98 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.99 | 12.78 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.14 | 3.06 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.36 | 12.22 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement