Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LUSNX vs PRTBX
LUSNX vs PRTBX Comparison
Open Charts LUSNX vs PRTBX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond A1
Price$10.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.95B
Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Trs I
Price$67.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.16M
LUSNX vs PRTBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LUSNX vs. PRTBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUSNX is a Hold and PRTBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUSNX has more cash in the bank: 14B vs. PRTBX (12.2M). LUSNX pays higher dividends than PRTBX: LUSNX (4.59) vs PRTBX (2.61). LUSNX was incepted earlier than PRTBX: LUSNX (6 years) vs PRTBX (38 years). PRTBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than LUSNX (0.53). LUSNX (69.00) and PRTBX (67.72) have comparable annual turnover. PRTBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LUSNX: PRTBX (1000) vs LUSNX (1500). LUSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. PRTBX (3.56). LUSNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.23 vs. PRTBX (7.93).
| LUSNX | PRTBX | LUSNX / PRTBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.21 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.261 | 3.148 | 104% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 12.2M | 114,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.59 | 2.61 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 3.56 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.54 | 11.50 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | 7.93 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement