LXP vs PJT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LXP is a Hold and PJT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LXP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePJT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LXP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PJT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LXP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PJT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LXP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PJT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LXP (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while PJT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +120.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
LXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
PJT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.72% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.50% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| LXP | PJT | LXP / PJT | |
| Capitalization | 2.61B | 2.27B | 115% |
| EBITDA | 272M | 245M | 111% |
| Gain YTD | -0.184 | -9.670 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 111.00 | 30.47 | 364% |
| Revenue | 341M | 1.15B | 30% |
| Total Cash | 329M | 356M | 92% |
| Total Debt | 1.66B | 331M | 502% |
LXP | PJT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LXP's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PJT (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LXP’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for LXP (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PJT’s stock grew significantly faster than LXP’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's SMR Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for LXP (87) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PJT’s stock grew significantly faster than LXP’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LXP (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to LXP’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LXP (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PJT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LXP’s over the last 12 months.
| LXP | PJT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | about 1 month ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 68% |
LXP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LXP has been closely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LXP jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LXP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LXP | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| STAG - LXP | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| EGP - LXP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| FR - LXP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| PLYM - LXP | 79% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| PLD - LXP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
PJT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJT has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJT jumps, then MC could also see price increases.