Advertisement
EVR vs PJT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Evercore Inc. (EVR) vs. PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EVR has delivered superior one-year returns of approximately 76%, significantly outpacing PJT's 15% gain, driven by robust advisory activity.
- Both stocks exhibit similar trailing P/E ratios around 23-24, reflecting comparable valuations in the investment banking sector.
- EVR boasts a larger market capitalization of $13.6 billion compared to PJT's $3.7 billion, indicating greater scale.
- Recent quarterly revenue growth stands higher for EVR at 32% year-over-year versus PJT's 12%, highlighting stronger momentum.
- Both firms maintain solid ROE (return on equity) above 30%, with PJT slightly edging out at 32%.
- Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings reports could influence near-term sentiment for both stocks.
Introduction
Evercore Inc. (EVR) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) are leading boutique investment banks specializing in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory and strategic transactions. This comparison is timely amid a resurgence in dealmaking activity and market volatility, offering insights into relative performance for investors focused on financial services stocks. Traders seeking exposure to high-margin advisory firms may find value in evaluating their growth trajectories, valuation metrics, and sensitivity to economic cycles. With both preparing to report Q1 2026 results, the analysis highlights key differences in scale, momentum, and positioning in the current environment.
EVR Overview and Recent Performance
Evercore Inc. (EVR) operates as a premier independent investment banking firm, providing M&A advisory, equity capital markets services, and wealth management through its Investment Banking & Equities and Investment Management segments. In recent market activity, EVR shares have shown resilience, with strong gains over the past year fueled by heightened M&A volumes and robust Q4 2025 results that beat EPS (earnings per share) expectations at $5.13. Year-to-date returns hover around 1.5%, while one-month performance exceeded 20%, reflecting positive sentiment from analyst upgrades and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings. Factors like diversified revenue streams and a favorable debt-to-equity ratio of 50% have supported stability amid broader market fluctuations.
PJT Overview and Recent Performance
PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) is a focused advisory firm delivering strategic M&A, restructuring, and capital markets services to corporations and institutional clients globally. Recent weeks have seen PJT shares advance around 10% in the past month and 7.5% year-to-date, building on a solid Q4 2025 EPS beat of $2.55. One-year returns stand at about 15%, influenced by steady demand for shareholder advisory and activism defense amid economic uncertainty. The firm's lean structure contributes to a competitive ROE (return on equity) of 32% and lower debt-to-equity of 41%, bolstering investor confidence ahead of its Q1 2026 earnings release.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers selected from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML signal generation, trend following, and risk-managed corridors (e.g., take-profit/stop-loss levels), delivering impressive stats such as annualized returns up to 167%, win rates ranging from 48% to 88%, and profit factors as high as 11.7. Examples include bots targeting semiconductors (NVDA, SOXL), leveraged ETFs (URTY, QLD), and multi-sector portfolios with average trade durations from one day to two months. While neither EVR nor PJT features prominently, these tools adapt to current conditions, offering traders data-driven edges. Explore the page to identify bots matching your timeframe and risk profile.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both EVR and PJT thrive on M&A cycles but differ in scale and diversification: EVR's larger platform includes equities and wealth management, driving higher revenue ($3.86B TTM vs. $1.71B) and faster quarterly growth. PJT emphasizes pure-play advisory, yielding a premium P/B (price-to-book) ratio of 12 versus EVR's 6.7, but trails in momentum with modest EPS growth. Risk profiles align with low debt levels, though EVR offers better liquidity via higher trading volume. Sector exposure centers on financials, where sentiment favors firms with deal catalysts; EVR edges in recent relative performance amid improving market positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis leans toward EVR in the current environment, based on superior trend consistency, accelerated revenue and EPS growth, and stronger relative one-year positioning. While PJT demonstrates stability with higher ROE, EVR's scale and momentum suggest greater upside potential amid anticipated M&A recovery, pending earnings outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EVR is a Hold and PJT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePJT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EVR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PJT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PJT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EVR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PJT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.33% price change this week, while PJT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
EVR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PJT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| EVR | PJT | EVR / PJT | |
| Capitalization | 14.5B | 3.99B | 363% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 422M | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.498 | -7.261 | -145% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.05 | 22.40 | 94% |
| Revenue | 4.55B | 1.81B | 252% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 309M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.1B | 421M | 261% |
EVR | PJT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PJT's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (89). This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PJT (35). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's SMR Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (22). This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PJT (52). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
EVR's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PJT (72). This means that EVR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
| EVR | PJT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IRVH | 19.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF | |||
| TCAF | 40.28 | -0.10 | -0.25% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec Eq ETF | |||
| REM | 21.28 | -0.17 | -0.79% |
| iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF | |||
| PGP | 8.57 | -0.09 | -1.04% |
| PIMCO Global StockPLUS & Income Fund | |||
| TTDU | 2.71 | -0.13 | -4.58% |
| T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | |||
EVR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
PJT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJT has been closely correlated with HLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJT jumps, then HLI could also see price increases.