Advertisement
PIPR vs PJT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) vs. PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PIPR has significantly outperformed PJT over the past year, gaining 57% compared to 14%.
- Both stocks trade at similar trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios around 22x, reflecting comparable valuations.
- PIPR reported stronger recent quarterly revenue growth of 37.6% year-over-year (YoY), versus PJT's 11.6%.
- PJT shows higher return on equity (ROE) at 32.4% compared to PIPR's 19.6%.
- PIPR offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 0.8% than PJT's 0.65%.
- PJT has lower volatility with a beta of 0.87, versus PIPR's 1.48.
Introduction
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) are mid-cap investment banks operating in the competitive financial services sector, with focuses on advisory and capital markets. This comparison is relevant for traders and investors eyeing boutique firms benefiting from recovering mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity and institutional trading. Amid recent market volatility, understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles helps assess positioning in a landscape influenced by deal flow, interest rates, and economic sentiment. Both offer exposure to high-margin advisory fees, making them attractive for those tracking financial sector relative strength.
PIPR Overview and Recent Performance
Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is an investment bank and institutional securities firm serving corporations, private equity groups, public entities, and institutional investors. It provides services including M&A advisory, equity and debt financing, public finance, sales and trading, and alternative asset management. In recent market activity, PIPR's stock has shown resilience, with year-to-date gains around 5% and a robust one-year return of 57%, trading near $88 within a 52-week range of $58-$95. Recent quarters highlighted strong results, including Q4 revenue of $635 million (up 37.6% YoY) and net income of $123 million, driven by elevated investment banking fees and trading volumes. Sentiment remains positive ahead of upcoming Q1 earnings, supported by diversified revenue streams amid improving deal environments, though higher beta reflects sensitivity to market swings.
PJT Overview and Recent Performance
PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) is an investment bank specializing in strategic advisory, including M&A, shareholder engagement, capital markets, restructuring, and special situations for corporations, sponsors, and governments. In recent weeks, PJT's shares have traded around $153 in a 52-week range of $128-$196, with year-to-date performance near 9% and one-year gains of 14%. The firm posted solid Q4 revenue of $535 million (up 11.6% YoY) and net income of $112 million, bolstered by restructuring and advisory demand. Lower beta underscores stability, but performance has lagged broader peers due to moderated growth in core advisory fees. Market sentiment is steady, tied to geopolitical advisory and deal pipeline visibility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron features over 350 AI Trading Bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, dip buying, and multi-agent systems using technical (TA) or fundamental analysis (FA). Only the top performers suited to current conditions appear in the curated Trending AI Robots section, currently showcasing 25 bots with impressive stats: win rates from 48% to 88%, profit factors of 1.5 to 11.7, and annualized returns up to 170%. For example, the top bot in semiconductor manufacturing delivers +105% annualized with 64% wins over 8-day trades on tickers like LRCX and ASML, while swing traders in industrials post +34% returns. These bots vary by timeframe (5min to 60 days) and sectors, offering tailored approaches for different risk appetites. Traders can explore and copy these high-performing models on the Trending AI Robots page to enhance strategies.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PIPR and PJT share mid-cap market caps around $6 billion but differ in business models: PIPR is more diversified with trading, public finance, and asset management alongside advisory, providing revenue stability; PJT concentrates on high-margin strategic advisory and restructuring for potentially higher fees per deal. Growth drivers include M&A rebound and institutional activity, where PIPR edges with broader exposure. Recent momentum favors PIPR's superior one-year returns and revenue acceleration, while PJT offers better ROE and stability via lower beta. Risk factors: PIPR faces cyclical trading volatility; PJT depends on lumpy advisory wins. Sector exposure aligns in financials, with sentiment tilting toward PIPR pre-earnings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors PIPR over PJT, based on stronger trend consistency, accelerated revenue and EPS growth in recent quarters, and superior relative one-year performance. While PJT provides stability and high ROE, PIPR's diversification and upcoming catalysts position it probabilistically better for near-term upside in a momentum-driven environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PIPR is a Buy and PJT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PIPR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePJT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PJT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PIPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PJT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PIPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PJT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while PJT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
PJT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| PIPR | PJT | PIPR / PJT | |
| Capitalization | 5.53B | 3.99B | 138% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 422M | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.632 | -7.261 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.62 | 22.40 | 92% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 1.81B | 108% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 309M | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 421M | 27% |
PIPR | PJT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PIPR's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PJT (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PJT’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as PJT (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
PJT's SMR Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (41) in the null industry. This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PJT (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PJT (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.
| PIPR | PJT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 63% | 12 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
PIPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPR | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| RJF - PIPR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| EVR - PIPR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MC - PIPR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PWP - PIPR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| SF - PIPR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
PJT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJT has been closely correlated with HLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJT jumps, then HLI could also see price increases.