LYFT
Price
$20.26
Change
-$0.38 (-1.84%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
8.23B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
QTWO
Price
$61.43
Change
-$1.26 (-2.01%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYFT vs QTWO

Header iconLYFT vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts LYFT vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Lyft
Price$20.26
Change-$0.38 (-1.84%)
Volume$13.31M
Capitalization8.23B
Q2 Holdings
Price$61.43
Change-$1.26 (-2.01%)
Volume$801.6K
Capitalization3.84B
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYFT vs. QTWO commentary
Oct 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LYFT: $20.26 vs. QTWO: $61.43)
Brand notoriety: LYFT: Notable vs. QTWO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYFT: 65% vs. QTWO: 61%
Market capitalization -- LYFT: $8.23B vs. QTWO: $3.84B
LYFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.23B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $325.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYFT is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LYFT and QTWO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.43% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($8.24B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.84B). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than LYFT: QTWO (1023.83) vs LYFT (89.74). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 57.054 vs. QTWO (-38.967). LYFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 266M vs. QTWO (77.5M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. QTWO (532M). QTWO has less debt than LYFT: QTWO (539M) vs LYFT (770M). LYFT has higher revenues than QTWO: LYFT (6.11B) vs QTWO (743M).
LYFTQTWOLYFT / QTWO
Capitalization8.24B3.84B215%
EBITDA266M77.5M343%
Gain YTD57.054-38.967-146%
P/E Ratio89.741023.839%
Revenue6.11B743M822%
Total Cash1.79B532M337%
Total Debt770M539M143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYFT vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
LYFT
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYFT's Valuation (77) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (57) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYFTQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHCUX19.810.02
+0.12%
Baron Health Care R6
GCICX17.54N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts C
DNLRX65.31N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Active MidCap I
TIISX13.82N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq R6
CWMCX66.36-0.14
-0.21%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529C