LYFT
Price
$12.07
Change
+$0.63 (+5.51%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.74B
14 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.97
Change
+$1.51 (+1.95%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.1B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LYFT vs QTWO

Header iconLYFT vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts LYFT vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Lyft
Price$12.07
Change+$0.63 (+5.51%)
Volume$175.7K
Capitalization7.74B
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.97
Change+$1.51 (+1.95%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization3.1B
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYFT vs. QTWO commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LYFT: $11.44 vs. QTWO: $77.46)
Brand notoriety: LYFT: Notable vs. QTWO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYFT: 76% vs. QTWO: 55%
Market capitalization -- LYFT: $7.74B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
LYFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.74B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than LYFT.

Price Growth

LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.54% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.99% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: -11.318 vs. QTWO (-23.040). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than LYFT: QTWO (549M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than QTWO: LYFT (4.4B) vs QTWO (625M).
LYFTQTWOLYFT / QTWO
Capitalization7.74B3.11B249%
EBITDA-188.97M15.6M-1,211%
Gain YTD-11.318-23.04049%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.4B625M705%
Total Cash1.69B324M520%
Total Debt1.04B549M190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYFT vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
LYFT
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
8591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYFT (86) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (79) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYFTQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNTTX43.79N/A
N/A
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts M
OCMPX16.33N/A
N/A
Lazard International Quality Gr Open
DFVQX14.72N/A
N/A
DFA International Vector Equity I
NSMVX35.14N/A
N/A
North Star Micro Cap I
RPEBX57.27N/A
N/A
American Funds New Perspective R2E

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+3.34%
ACIW - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
ALKT - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.46%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
EVCM - QTWO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
LYFT - QTWO
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
More