LYFT
Price
$15.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
53 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$91.27
Change
+$1.29 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYFT vs QTWO

Header iconLYFT vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts LYFT vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Lyft
Price$15.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.6M
Capitalization7.74B
Q2 Holdings
Price$91.27
Change+$1.29 (+1.43%)
Volume$409.86K
Capitalization3.1B
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYFT vs. QTWO commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LYFT: $15.53 vs. QTWO: $91.27)
Brand notoriety: LYFT: Notable vs. QTWO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYFT: 60% vs. QTWO: 68%
Market capitalization -- LYFT: $7.74B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
LYFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.74B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYFT is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 20.388 vs. QTWO (-9.319). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than LYFT: QTWO (549M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than QTWO: LYFT (4.4B) vs QTWO (625M).
LYFTQTWOLYFT / QTWO
Capitalization7.74B3.11B249%
EBITDA-188.97M15.6M-1,211%
Gain YTD20.388-9.319-219%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.4B625M705%
Total Cash1.69B324M520%
Total Debt1.04B549M190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYFT vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
LYFT
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
7490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (76) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (74) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (43) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYFTQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWAX11.810.10
+0.85%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr A
RERFX60.860.19
+0.31%
American Funds EUPAC R5
DPRDX12.750.01
+0.08%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets R6
HMVYX17.25N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value Y
MLPZX6.46N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Y

LYFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with UBER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then UBER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYFT
1D Price
Change %
LYFT100%
N/A
UBER - LYFT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
COIN - LYFT
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
EVCM - LYFT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
QTWO - LYFT
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
SPT - LYFT
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.43%
FRSH - QTWO
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
ANSS - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
ADSK - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More