LYFT vs QTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LYFT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LYFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
LYFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
QTWO is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.34% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LYFT | QTWO | LYFT / QTWO | |
| Capitalization | 7.74B | 3.11B | 249% |
| EBITDA | -188.97M | 15.6M | -1,211% |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | -9.886 | -44% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.4B | 625M | 705% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 324M | 520% |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 549M | 190% |
LYFT | QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QTWO's Valuation (45) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYFT (86) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's SMR Rating (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LYFT (60) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
LYFT's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| LYFT | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
LYFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with UBER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then UBER could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| UBER - LYFT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| COIN - LYFT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| DTSS - LYFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.35% | ||
| CLSK - LYFT | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| QTWO - LYFT | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| ACIW - QTWO | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| COMP - QTWO | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
| CLSK - QTWO | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||