LYSFF
Price
$4.70
Change
+$0.41 (+9.56%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
MAMA
Price
$8.99
Change
+$0.17 (+1.93%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
186.68M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSFF vs MAMA

Header iconLYSFF vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LYSFF vs MAMABanner chart's image
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$4.70
Change+$0.41 (+9.56%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.49B
Mama's Creations
Price$8.99
Change+$0.17 (+1.93%)
Volume$316.5K
Capitalization186.68M
LYSFF vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSFF vs. MAMA commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSFF is a Hold and MAMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSFF: $4.70 vs. MAMA: $8.99)
Brand notoriety: LYSFF and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSFF: 27% vs. MAMA: 113%
Market capitalization -- LYSFF: $2.49B vs. MAMA: $186.68M
LYSFF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.49B. MAMA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $186.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYSFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the short-term than LYSFF.

Price Growth

LYSFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +9.56% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +10.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSFF($2.49B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($187M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than LYSFF: MAMA (26.24) vs LYSFF (7.93). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 12.940 vs. LYSFF (7.062). LYSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.12B vs. MAMA (9.86M). LYSFF has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. MAMA (5.56M). MAMA has less debt than LYSFF: MAMA (15.2M) vs LYSFF (9.44B). LYSFF has higher revenues than MAMA: LYSFF (28.1B) vs MAMA (96.4M).
LYSFFMAMALYSFF / MAMA
Capitalization2.49B187M1,330%
EBITDA6.12B9.86M61,999%
Gain YTD7.06212.94055%
P/E Ratio7.9326.2430%
Revenue28.1B96.4M29,149%
Total Cash3.59B5.56M64,478%
Total Debt9.44B15.2M62,132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSFF vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LYSFF
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
7048
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (89). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSFF (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (70). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (47). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYSFF (75). This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSFFMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMHI1.250.32
+35.14%
Retrieve Medical Holdings Inc
SCGLY11.680.17
+1.48%
Societe Generale
EFRGF0.38N/A
N/A
Pasofino Gold Ltd.
IFUUF5.40N/A
N/A
Infrastructure & Utilities NZ Ltd.
IGPYF0.69N/A
N/A
ARGOSY PPTY LTD.

LYSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFF and CVNZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFF and CVNZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFF
1D Price
Change %
LYSFF100%
N/A
CVNZF - LYSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSF - LYSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
MAMA - LYSFF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
NCHEY - LYSFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAY - LYSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+1.93%
JBSS - MAMA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
LWAY - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
NATR - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
More