LYSFF
Price
$5.15
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
MAMA
Price
$10.68
Change
-$0.13 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
437.79M
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSFF vs MAMA

Header iconLYSFF vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LYSFF vs MAMABanner chart's image
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$5.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.03B
Mama's Creations
Price$10.68
Change-$0.13 (-1.20%)
Volume$100
Capitalization437.79M
LYSFF vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSFF vs. MAMA commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSFF is a Buy and MAMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSFF: $5.15 vs. MAMA: $10.81)
Brand notoriety: LYSFF and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSFF: 22% vs. MAMA: 81%
Market capitalization -- LYSFF: $3.03B vs. MAMA: $437.79M
LYSFF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.03B. MAMA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $437.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYSFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSFF is a better buy in the short-term than MAMA.

Price Growth

LYSFF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.97% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSFF($3.03B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($438M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than LYSFF: MAMA (98.27) vs LYSFF (23.36). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 35.804 vs. LYSFF (17.312). LYSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.48B vs. MAMA (7.9M). LYSFF has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. MAMA (12M). MAMA has less debt than LYSFF: MAMA (12.8M) vs LYSFF (12.7B). LYSFF has higher revenues than MAMA: LYSFF (33.1B) vs MAMA (129M).
LYSFFMAMALYSFF / MAMA
Capitalization3.03B438M692%
EBITDA2.48B7.9M31,317%
Gain YTD17.31235.80448%
P/E Ratio23.3698.2724%
Revenue33.1B129M25,659%
Total Cash1.94B12M16,133%
Total Debt12.7B12.8M99,219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSFF vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LYSFF
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3720
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
7947
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (91). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSFF (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (79). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (46). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (16). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSFFMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDMIX17.39N/A
N/A
Lazard Developing Markets Equity Instl
FTRIX30.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock I
FEQAX14.71N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Hedged Equity Fund A
JSVUX29.47N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R6
FCAJX13.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action A

LYSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFF and CVNZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFF and CVNZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFF
1D Price
Change %
LYSFF100%
N/A
CVNZF - LYSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSF - LYSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.89%
MAMA - LYSFF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCHEY - LYSFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAY - LYSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
N/A
JBSS - MAMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
MZTI - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
USNA - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More