Advertisement
LZB vs NTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZB is a Hold and NTZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LZB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LZB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LZB (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -4.94% price change this week, while NTZ (@Home Furnishings) price change was -5.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
LZB is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.
NTZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Furnishings (-2.22% weekly)The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
| LZB | NTZ | LZB / NTZ | |
| Capitalization | 1.6B | 68.8M | 2,331% |
| EBITDA | 281M | 5.34M | 5,267% |
| Gain YTD | -11.219 | -18.542 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.65 | 7.05 | 194% |
| Revenue | 2.06B | 436M | 471% |
| Total Cash | 329M | 53.5M | 615% |
| Total Debt | 496M | 111M | 447% |
LZB | NTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LZB's Valuation (32) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (64). This means that LZB’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.
LZB's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (82). This means that LZB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.
LZB's SMR Rating (59) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (93). This means that LZB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.
NTZ's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LZB (61). This means that NTZ’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.
LZB's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (99). This means that LZB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| LZB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
Advertisement
LZB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZB has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZB jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LZB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZB | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| ETD - LZB | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| MLKN - LZB | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| PATK - LZB | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| SGI - LZB | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| AMWD - LZB | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
More | ||||
NTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTZ and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTZ and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTZ | 100% | -4.63% | ||
| CRWS - NTZ | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
| SN - NTZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.60% | ||
| PATK - NTZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.34% | ||
| LEG - NTZ | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| ETD - NTZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||