Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$12.40
Change+$0.21 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.43
Change+$1.88 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. LZCOX (41M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.31) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (28 years) vs NAESX (64 years). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.50 vs. LZCOX (14.60). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.38 vs. LZCOX (-1.11).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.319 | 21.064 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.60 | 34.50 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.26 | 12.49 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.11 | 63.38 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.44 | 129.56 | -18% |