Ad is loading...
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.95M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.91
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Jan 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. LZCOX (38.9M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.31) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (28 years) vs NAESX (64 years). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.31 vs. LZCOX (-2.12). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.29 vs. LZCOX (-15.26).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.021 | 0.660 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9M | 155B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 16.31 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.07 | 10.62 | -198% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.26 | 48.29 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.97 | 117.58 | -16% |