Ad is loading...
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$8.76
Change-$0.84 (-8.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.16M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.10
Change-$7.24 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. LZCOX (34.2M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.39) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (28 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. LZCOX (-16.88). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 115.68 vs. LZCOX (19.41).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.603 | -5.833 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.2M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.88 | 1.18 | -1,436% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.38 | 6.44 | -409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.41 | 115.68 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.35 | 90.61 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...