Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. LZCOX (36.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.07) vs LZCOX (0.33). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (29 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LZCOX (1.59) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: NAESX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. LZCOX (21.07). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. LZCOX (-20.38).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.17 | 935% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.602 | 15.738 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.6M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.07 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.07 | 23.34 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.14 | 48.12 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.38 | 38.39 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.01 | 157.36 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement