Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. LZCOX (34.3M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.09) vs LZCOX (0.55). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (30 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LZCOX (1.59) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: NAESX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. LZCOX (12.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LZCOX (-25.38).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.17 | 935% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.156 | 12.982 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.3M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 13.09 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.09 | 49.57 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.38 | 32.77 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.72 | 152.60 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement