Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZEMX vs RNWBX
LZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts LZEMX vs RNWBX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$23.13
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.61
Change+$0.45 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
LZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. LZEMX (5.63B). LZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: LZEMX (2.50) vs RNWBX (0.13). LZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: LZEMX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than LZEMX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LZEMX (20.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs LZEMX (10000). LZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.52 vs. RNWBX (15.12). LZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 83.86 vs. RNWBX (23.93).
| LZEMX | RNWBX | LZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.739 | 21.224 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.63B | 73.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.13 | 1,996% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.52 | 15.12 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.94 | 45.18 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.86 | 23.93 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.59 | 87.45 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers