Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZEMX vs RNWBX
LZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts LZEMX vs RNWBX
LZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. LZEMX (9.56B). LZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: LZEMX (1.65) vs RNWBX (0.41). LZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: LZEMX (32 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than LZEMX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. LZEMX (27.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs LZEMX (10000). LZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.32 vs. RNWBX (26.72). LZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.99 vs. RNWBX (14.77).
| LZEMX | RNWBX | LZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.514 | 16.263 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.56B | 90.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.41 | 398% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.32 | 26.72 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.23 | 46.29 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.99 | 14.77 | 609% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.91 | 115.61 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers