Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZEMX vs RNWFX
LZEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts LZEMX vs RNWFX
LZEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. LZEMX (10B). LZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: LZEMX (1.67) vs RNWFX (1.20). LZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: LZEMX (32 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). LZEMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. LZEMX (27.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZEMX: RNWFX (250) vs LZEMX (10000). LZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.96 vs. RNWFX (14.99). LZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 102.13 vs. RNWFX (17.73).
| LZEMX | RNWFX | LZEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.62 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.62 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.549 | 14.935 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 90B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.96 | 14.99 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.23 | 52.55 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.13 | 17.73 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.87 | 110.22 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement