Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZEMX vs RNWHX
LZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts LZEMX vs RNWHX
LZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. LZEMX (10B). LZEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: LZEMX (1.67) vs RNWHX (1.15). LZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: LZEMX (32 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). LZEMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. LZEMX (27.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs LZEMX (10000). LZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.96 vs. RNWHX (14.78). LZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 102.13 vs. RNWHX (16.98).
| LZEMX | RNWHX | LZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.549 | 14.859 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 90B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.96 | 14.78 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.23 | 51.89 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.13 | 16.98 | 601% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.87 | 107.46 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement