Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZISX vs SCWFX
LZISX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts LZISX vs SCWFX
LZISX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZISX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZISX is a Buy and SCWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. LZISX (20.2M). LZISX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: LZISX (1.47) vs SCWFX (0.54). LZISX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: LZISX (33 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). LZISX (2.17) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). LZISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZISX: SCWFX (250) vs LZISX (10000). LZISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.31 vs. SCWFX (13.69). LZISX return over 5 years is better than : -3.76 vs. SCWFX (-4.45).
| LZISX | SCWFX | LZISX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.07 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.740 | 11.993 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.54 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.31 | 13.69 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.27 | 29.75 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.76 | -4.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.10 | 86.08 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement