Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSCX vs NAESX
LZSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZSCX vs NAESX
LZSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. LZSCX (36.3M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZSCX: NAESX (1.08) vs LZSCX (0.51). LZSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZSCX (35 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LZSCX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSCX: NAESX (0) vs LZSCX (10000). NAESX (28.95) and LZSCX (28.57) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. LZSCX (-19.62).
| LZSCX | NAESX | LZSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.17 | 741% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.824 | 13.680 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3M | 177B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.08 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.57 | 28.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.59 | 54.86 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.62 | 33.38 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.34 | 160.50 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement