Ad is loading...
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard International Small Cap Eq Open
Price$9.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.69M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$28.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a StrongBuy and MIDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.14B vs. LZSMX (9.69M). MIDCX (1.50) and LZSMX (1.47) have matching dividends . LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (28 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.35) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. MIDCX (1.18). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.34 vs. LZSMX (-1.78).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 2.06 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.425 | 8.603 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.69M | 6.14B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 1.18 | 877% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.77 | 7.00 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.78 | 8.34 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.35 | 7.08 | -146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...