Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard International Small Cap Eq Open
Price$10.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.16
Change+$0.11 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.76B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.76B vs. LZSMX (12.5M). MIDCX pays higher dividends than LZSMX: MIDCX (1.42) vs LZSMX (1.29). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (28 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.83 vs. MIDCX (3.83). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.04 vs. LZSMX (-3.90).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.227 | 13.298 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5M | 6.76B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.83 | 3.83 | 544% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.79 | 9.77 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.90 | 1.04 | -375% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.07 | 12.55 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement