Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Open
Price$10.52
Change-$0.12 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.35M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.91
Change-$0.25 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a StrongBuy and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. LZSMX (13.3M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDCX: LZSMX (1.77) vs MIDCX (1.37). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (29 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.66 vs. MIDCX (1.43). LZSMX return over 5 years is better than : -2.28 vs. MIDCX (-2.53).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.271 | 17.055 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3M | 6.96B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.37 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.66 | 1.43 | 1,727% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.96 | 28.90 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.28 | -2.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.66 | 21.19 | 55% |