Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard International Small Cap Eq Open
Price$10.12
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.43M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.42
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and MIDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. LZSMX (12.4M). MIDCX pays higher dividends than LZSMX: MIDCX (1.39) vs LZSMX (1.30). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (28 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.87 vs. MIDCX (4.69). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.71 vs. LZSMX (-2.55).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.976 | 14.275 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4M | 6.59B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 4.69 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.84 | 17.08 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.55 | 3.71 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.09 | 13.69 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement