Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Open
Price$9.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.07M
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$29.76
Change-$0.10 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. LZSMX (12.1M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDCX: LZSMX (1.76) vs MIDCX (1.40). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (29 years) vs MIDCX (25 years). LZSMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.06). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.53 vs. MIDCX (3.57). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : -11.10 vs. LZSMX (-13.64).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.06 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.816 | 12.171 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1M | 7.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.40 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.53 | 3.57 | 743% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.65 | 12.60 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.64 | -11.10 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.30 | 15.14 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement