Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs MIDCX
LZSMX vs MIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. MIDCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and MIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. LZSMX (18.8M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than MIDCX: LZSMX (0.90) vs MIDCX (0.62). LZSMX was incepted earlier than MIDCX: LZSMX (30 years) vs MIDCX (26 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than MIDCX (2.04). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. MIDCX (17.00). MIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: MIDCX (1000) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. MIDCX (4.27). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : -11.94 vs. LZSMX (-16.57).
| LZSMX | MIDCX | LZSMX / MIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 2.03 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 2.04 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.745 | 8.311 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 7.54B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.62 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 4.27 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.25 | 20.90 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.57 | -11.94 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.15 | 23.81 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement