Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs RSEBX
LZSMX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs RSEBX
LZSMX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. LZSMX (20.2M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LZSMX (1.27) vs RSEBX (0.27). LZSMX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LZSMX (29 years) vs RSEBX (12 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RSEBX (41.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: RSEBX (250) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.91 vs. RSEBX (13.14). LZSMX return over 5 years is better than : -4.94 vs. RSEBX (-6.47).
| LZSMX | RSEBX | LZSMX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.45 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.45 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.459 | 11.761 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.27 | 470% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.91 | 13.14 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.85 | 28.16 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.94 | -6.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.68 | 78.80 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers