Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs RSEBX
LZSMX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs RSEBX
LZSMX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. LZSMX (21.1M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LZSMX (1.30) vs RSEBX (0.31). LZSMX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LZSMX (29 years) vs RSEBX (12 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RSEBX (41.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: RSEBX (250) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.29 vs. RSEBX (19.55). LZSMX return over 5 years is better than : -2.35 vs. RSEBX (-4.21).
| LZSMX | RSEBX | LZSMX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.45 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.45 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.846 | 14.525 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.31 | 417% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.29 | 19.55 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.95 | 34.71 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.35 | -4.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.81 | 88.95 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers