Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs RSLDX
LZSMX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs RSLDX
LZSMX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. RSLDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. LZSMX (20.3M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: LZSMX (1.40) vs RSLDX (0.80). LZSMX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: LZSMX (30 years) vs RSLDX (11 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RSLDX (41.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: RSLDX (250) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.60 vs. RSLDX (15.50). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : -1.56 vs. LZSMX (-8.17).
| LZSMX | RSLDX | LZSMX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.80 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.80 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.107 | 14.750 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.3M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.80 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.60 | 15.50 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.18 | 41.60 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.17 | -1.56 | 523% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.50 | 86.49 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement