Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs SCWFX
LZSMX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs SCWFX
LZSMX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. LZSMX (18.8M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: LZSMX (0.90) vs SCWFX (0.56). LZSMX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: LZSMX (30 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: SCWFX (250) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. SCWFX (8.85). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.66 vs. LZSMX (-16.57).
| LZSMX | SCWFX | LZSMX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.07 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.07 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.745 | 12.243 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.56 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 8.85 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.25 | 37.17 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.57 | -9.66 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.15 | 81.80 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement