Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZSMX vs SCWFX
LZSMX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts LZSMX vs SCWFX
LZSMX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZSMX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZSMX is a Buy and SCWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. LZSMX (20.2M). LZSMX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: LZSMX (1.27) vs SCWFX (0.54). LZSMX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: LZSMX (29 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: SCWFX (250) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.91 vs. SCWFX (13.69). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.45 vs. LZSMX (-4.94).
| LZSMX | SCWFX | LZSMX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.07 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.07 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.459 | 11.993 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.54 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.91 | 13.69 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.85 | 29.75 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.94 | -4.45 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.68 | 86.08 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers