MA
Price
$441.10
Change
-$1.20 (-0.27%)
Updated
May 2, 6:59 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
WU
Price
$12.99
Change
-$0.09 (-0.69%)
Updated
May 2, 6:59 PM EST
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price MA vs WU

Header iconMA vs WU Comparison
Open Charts MA vs WUBanner chart's image
Mastercard
Price$441.10
Change-$1.20 (-0.27%)
Volume$1.28M
CapitalizationN/A
Western Union Company (The)
Price$12.99
Change-$0.09 (-0.69%)
Volume$1.04M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MA vs WU Comparison Chart

Loading...

MADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
WUDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
MA vs. WU commentary
May 03, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a Buy and WU is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 03, 2024
Stock price -- (MA: $442.07 vs. WU: $13.09)
Brand notoriety: MA: Notable vs. WU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 212% vs. WU: 87%
Market capitalization -- MA: $446.3B vs. WU: $4.7B
MA [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $446.3B. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than WU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the short-term than MA.

Price Growth

MA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -4.42% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

WU is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.27% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MA with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for WU with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($446B) has a higher market cap than WU($4.7B). MA has higher P/E ratio than WU: MA (40.44) vs WU (8.18). WU YTD gains are higher at: 11.754 vs. MA (3.812). MA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. WU (1.04B). MA has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. WU (3.22B). WU has less debt than MA: WU (2.67B) vs MA (15.7B). MA has higher revenues than WU: MA (25.1B) vs WU (4.36B).
MAWUMA / WU
Capitalization446B4.7B9,485%
EBITDA15B1.04B1,449%
Gain YTD3.81211.75432%
P/E Ratio40.448.18494%
Revenue25.1B4.36B576%
Total Cash9.18B3.22B285%
Total Debt15.7B2.67B589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
MA
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
649
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17100
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WU's Valuation (84) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MA (90). This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WU (100). This means that MA’s stock grew significantly faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (12). This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

WU's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MA (50). This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

WU's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MA (61). This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
WUDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAGP26.43N/A
+0.01%
Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF
AOR53.77-0.01
-0.02%
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
ADIV14.06-0.02
-0.16%
SmartETFs Asia Pcfc Dvdnd Bldr ETF
IQSU42.59-0.13
-0.29%
IQ Candriam U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
EPU40.59-0.25
-0.61%
iShares MSCI Peru ETF

WU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WU has been loosely correlated with BBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WU jumps, then BBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WU
1D Price
Change %
WU100%
-2.60%
BBDC - WU
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
UPBD - WU
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
OMF - WU
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
CACC - WU
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
NAVI - WU
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
More