This stock comparison examines MAA and SUI, two prominent residential REITs navigating a market shaped by persistent interest rate pressures and steady housing demand. Investors and traders interested in income generation, sector rotation, or relative performance in real estate may find value here. Both companies benefit from demographic tailwinds in housing but differ in property types and geographic focus, offering insights into trade-offs between stability and niche growth potential in recent market activity.
Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) owns and operates approximately 102,000 apartment units across the Sunbelt region, emphasizing high-growth markets like the Southeast and Southwest. As a multifamily REIT, it generates revenue primarily from rental income, with strong occupancy rates supporting steady cash flows. In recent weeks, MAA's stock has traded around $127, within a 52-week range of $120 to $169, reflecting broader REIT sensitivity to elevated interest rates that increase borrowing costs. Year-to-date gains of about 6.7% have outpaced the sector average, bolstered by the declaration of its 129th consecutive quarterly dividend. Sentiment has been mixed, with some analyst price target reductions amid concerns over funds from operations (FFO—a key REIT profitability metric), yet consensus targets suggest around 14% upside potential. Upcoming earnings are anticipated to provide clarity on rent growth and expense management.
Sun Communities (SUI) specializes in manufactured housing (MH) and recreational vehicle (RV) communities, managing over 75,000 developed homesites across the U.S. and Canada. This niche focus targets affordable housing segments resilient to urban rent pressures. Recently, shares have hovered near $130, in a 52-week range of $116 to $138, with YTD returns of roughly 5.5%. Positive developments include portfolio simplification strategies and an auditor transition, alongside analyst notes highlighting MH REIT outperformance potential. Dividend distributions continue, though at a lower yield than peers. Market sentiment reflects optimism for sector-specific demand drivers like aging demographics, tempered by macroeconomic headwinds. First-quarter earnings loom as a key catalyst for updated guidance.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, dip buying, and multi-agent systems on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, with performance stats including annualized returns ranging from 15% to 178%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Examples target sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, energy, and aerospace, adapting to current volatility. Traders can explore these for real-time signals and risk-managed copy trading suited to prevailing market conditions. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate options aligning with your strategy.
MAA and SUI share residential REIT exposure but diverge in business models: MAA's apartment portfolio benefits from urban migration and rent escalations in growth corridors, while SUI's MH/RV assets capitalize on affordable, recession-resistant housing with higher barriers to new supply. Growth drivers include same-store net operating income (NOI—a measure of core property performance) expansion, though both face rate-driven acquisition slowdowns. Recent momentum favors MAA's YTD edge and superior dividend yield, contrasting SUI's larger market cap ($16.6B vs. $14.7B) and niche catalysts like sector outperformance calls. Risk factors overlap in interest rate sensitivity but SUI contends with regulatory shifts in manufactured housing. Market sentiment leans moderately bullish for both, with MAA's lower beta signaling reduced volatility amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward MAA over SUI, citing greater trend consistency through higher dividend sustainability, lower beta for stability, and a slight YTD performance advantage. While SUI offers compelling niche exposure with potential catalysts, MAA's positioning provides a higher probability of relative outperformance in a high-rate environment focused on income and defense.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSUI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
MAA (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while SUI (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.
MAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
SUI is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| MAA | SUI | MAA / SUI | |
| Capitalization | 15.6B | 14.7B | 106% |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 674M | 182% |
| Gain YTD | -1.324 | -3.681 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.04 | 140.42 | 29% |
| Revenue | 2.21B | 2.29B | 97% |
| Total Cash | 71.5M | 497M | 14% |
| Total Debt | 5.66B | 4.25B | 133% |
MAA | SUI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAA's Valuation (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUI (73). This means that MAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUI’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SUI (100). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to SUI’s over the last 12 months.
SUI's SMR Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAA (82). This means that SUI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAA’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SUI (70). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to SUI’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUI (91). This means that MAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUI’s over the last 12 months.
| MAA | SUI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 49% | 14 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUI has been closely correlated with ELS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUI jumps, then ELS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUI | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| ELS - SUI | 69% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| DBRG - SUI | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CUBE - SUI | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| MAA - SUI | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| STAG - SUI | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
More | ||||