Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MABAX vs RMFCX
MABAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MABAX vs RMFCX
MABAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MABAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MABAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. MABAX (1.97B). MABAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MABAX (1.71) vs RMFCX (1.16). MABAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MABAX (49 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MABAX (0.58). MABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MABAX: RMFCX (250) vs MABAX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. MABAX (-0.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.18 vs. MABAX (-1.32).
| MABAX | RMFCX | MABAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.91 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.91 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.705 | 8.607 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.16 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.93 | 7.00 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.85 | 31.37 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 36.18 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.21 | 90.23 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers