Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MABAX vs RMFEX
MABAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MABAX vs RMFEX
MABAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MABAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MABAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. MABAX (2.07B). RMFEX (1.41) and MABAX (1.41) have matching dividends . MABAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MABAX (49 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than MABAX (0.58). MABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MABAX: RMFEX (250) vs MABAX (2000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. MABAX (2.91). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.12 vs. MABAX (13.80).
| MABAX | RMFEX | MABAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.62 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.62 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.665 | 10.987 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 9.70 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.45 | 40.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.80 | 40.12 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.53 | 101.07 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement