MACE
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
RGP
Price
$8.04
Change
-$0.33 (-3.94%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MACE vs RGP

Header iconMACE vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts MACE vs RGPBanner chart's image
Mace Security International
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Resources Connection
Price$8.04
Change-$0.33 (-3.94%)
Volume$2.41K
CapitalizationN/A
MACE vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MACE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MACE vs. RGP commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACE is a Buy and RGP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MACE: $0.02 vs. RGP: $8.04)
Brand notoriety: MACE and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MACE: 5% vs. RGP: 102%
Market capitalization -- MACE: $4.22M vs. RGP: $440.97M
MACE [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $4.22M. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MACE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MACE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the long-term than MACE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MACE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MACE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MACE is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

MACE (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -8.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

MACE is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2024.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.50% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGP($441M) has a higher market cap than MACE($4.22M). MACE has higher P/E ratio than RGP: MACE (25.97) vs RGP (16.42). RGP YTD gains are higher at: -40.145 vs. MACE (-59.795). RGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.1M vs. MACE (-1.1M). MACE has less debt than RGP: MACE (2.84M) vs RGP (16.5M). RGP has higher revenues than MACE: RGP (705M) vs MACE (8.26M).
MACERGPMACE / RGP
Capitalization4.22M441M1%
EBITDA-1.1M46.1M-2%
Gain YTD-59.795-40.145149%
P/E Ratio25.9716.42158%
Revenue8.26M705M1%
Total Cash431KN/A-
Total Debt2.84M16.5M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MACE vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
MACE
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
48
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9280
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MACE (66). This means that RGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MACE’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MACE (100). This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to MACE’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MACE (95). This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to MACE’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MACE (92). This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to MACE’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MACE (27). This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to MACE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MACERGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MACE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHUSX29.01N/A
N/A
Alger Global Equity A
ARABX15.44N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq A
MFCCX36.61N/A
N/A
Meridian Contrarian C
SDLAX24.67-0.15
-0.60%
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation A (SIIT)
FIKHX149.85-0.95
-0.63%
Fidelity Advisor Technology Z

MACE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACE and SDXOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACE and SDXOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACE
1D Price
Change %
MACE100%
N/A
SDXOF - MACE
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGP - MACE
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
PGINF - MACE
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVDA - MACE
6%
Poorly correlated
+45.42%
SPIR - MACE
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FORR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FORR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-3.94%
FORR - RGP
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
GHC - RGP
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
UNF - RGP
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
CASS - RGP
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
EXPO - RGP
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
More