Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MACPX vs RLBEX
MACPX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MACPX vs RLBEX
MACPX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACPX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACPX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MACPX (1.83B). MACPX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MACPX (2.74) vs RLBEX (1.77). MACPX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MACPX (53 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). RLBEX (0.60) is less costly to investors than MACPX (0.55). MACPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACPX: RLBEX (250) vs MACPX (2000000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. MACPX (13.62). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.34 vs. MACPX (20.42).
| MACPX | RLBEX | MACPX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.60 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.60 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.895 | 9.691 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 279B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 1.77 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 17.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.90 | 45.48 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.42 | 35.34 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.20 | 88.34 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement