Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MACPX vs RLBFX
MACPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MACPX vs RLBFX
MACPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MACPX (1.8B). MACPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MACPX (2.40) vs RLBFX (2.03). MACPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MACPX (53 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MACPX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). MACPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACPX: RLBFX (250) vs MACPX (2000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. MACPX (2.13). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. MACPX (8.01).
| MACPX | RLBFX | MACPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.30 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.171 | 8.705 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.03 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 6.98 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.76 | 42.70 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | 33.18 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.77 | 87.98 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement