Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MACPX vs RLBFX
MACPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MACPX vs RLBFX
MACPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MACPX (1.83B). MACPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MACPX (2.74) vs RLBFX (2.02). MACPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MACPX (53 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MACPX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). MACPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACPX: RLBFX (250) vs MACPX (2000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. MACPX (13.62). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.10 vs. MACPX (20.42).
| MACPX | RLBFX | MACPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.30 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.895 | 9.817 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 279B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.02 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.62 | 18.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.90 | 46.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.42 | 37.10 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.20 | 89.73 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement