Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAFGX vs RGACX
MAFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MAFGX vs RGACX
MAFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAFGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MAFGX (3.89B). MAFGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . MAFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MAFGX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MAFGX (0.73). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MAFGX (29.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAFGX: RGACX (250) vs MAFGX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. MAFGX (6.86). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. MAFGX (2.70).
| MAFGX | RGACX | MAFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.575 | 6.185 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 7.94 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.11 | 43.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.70 | 13.23 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.31 | 107.97 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement