Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAFGX vs RGEBX
MAFGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MAFGX vs RGEBX
MAFGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAFGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAFGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MAFGX (3.73B). MAFGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MAFGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MAFGX (16 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than MAFGX (0.73). MAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAFGX: RGEBX (250) vs MAFGX (2000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. MAFGX (-13.55). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. MAFGX (-13.08).
| MAFGX | RGEBX | MAFGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.08 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.229 | 8.727 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.55 | -0.77 | 1,752% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.21 | 39.77 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.08 | 9.71 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.70 | 97.58 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement