MAGX
Price
$52.96
Change
+$3.26 (+6.56%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
56.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLL
Price
$7.31
Change
+$0.10 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Net Assets
3.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGX vs TSLL

MAGX vs TSLL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) vs. Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL)

Key Takeaways

  • MAGX provides daily 2X leveraged exposure to a basket of seven large-cap technology companies known as the Magnificent Seven, offering broader thematic diversification within the sector compared to single-stock strategies.
  • TSLL delivers daily 2X leveraged exposure exclusively to Tesla (TSLA), resulting in higher concentration risk and greater sensitivity to company-specific developments.
  • Both ETFs employ daily rebalancing to maintain their leveraged objectives and utilize derivatives such as total return swaps, making them suitable primarily for short-term trading by sophisticated investors rather than long-term holding.
  • MAGX carries a net expense ratio of 0.95%, while TSLL has a lower net expense ratio of 0.83%, reflecting differences in underlying complexity and operational structure.
  • The funds target distinct risk profiles: MAGX spreads exposure across multiple high-growth technology names, whereas TSLL amplifies volatility tied to one electric vehicle and energy company.
  • Both products are actively managed leveraged vehicles designed for daily performance alignment, with performance over multi-day periods subject to compounding effects that can deviate significantly from the stated leverage multiple.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to high-growth technology themes often compare leveraged ETFs with overlapping sector interests. The Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and the Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent alternative leveraged strategies within the technology and innovation space. MAGX offers diversified daily 2X exposure to a basket of leading technology firms, while TSLL concentrates leverage on a single prominent name in electric vehicles and clean energy. This distinction makes them relevant alternatives for investors pursuing tactical, short-term positioning in similar market segments.

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) Overview

The Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is an actively managed, leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF. It targets exposure to seven major technology companies: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The fund typically holds a combination of underlying exchange-traded funds and total return swaps to achieve its daily leveraged objective and rebalances daily. It features a net expense ratio of 0.95% and launched in February 2024. As a non-diversified fund with daily leverage, it carries elevated risk relative to unleveraged peers and is intended for knowledgeable investors who monitor positions frequently.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) Overview

The Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) is an actively managed, leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Tesla (TSLA) common shares. The fund employs derivatives, including swaps, to deliver its targeted leverage and rebalances daily to maintain the objective. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.83% and launched in August 2022. As a single-stock leveraged product, it eliminates diversification benefits and exhibits heightened volatility tied directly to movements in one underlying security. The ETF is designed for short-term trading by investors comfortable with leverage risk and daily monitoring requirements.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly companies involved in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, electric vehicles, and digital services, continues to experience strong capital flows driven by innovation cycles and corporate adoption of new technologies. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, regulatory developments around data privacy and antitrust, and supply chain dynamics influence sector performance. Both ETFs are positioned within this environment, with MAGX capturing a broad slice of leading technology names and TSLL focusing on electric vehicle and energy transition themes. Risks include rapid technological change, competitive pressures, and potential policy shifts affecting subsidies or market access.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, leveraged ETFs such as MAGX and TSLL have demonstrated amplified responses to movements in their respective underlying assets. MAGX benefits from diversification across multiple technology leaders, potentially moderating volatility relative to single-name exposure during periods of sector rotation or uneven earnings results. TSLL, by contrast, exhibits more pronounced swings tied to Tesla-specific events, including product launches, production updates, and macroeconomic sensitivity in the electric vehicle market. Over multi-week or monthly horizons, compounding effects from daily rebalancing can lead to performance divergence from simple multiples of underlying returns, underscoring the importance of short-term holding horizons for both products.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged or thematic products may find the tool useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, MAGX presents a modestly more balanced profile due to its diversified exposure across multiple technology holdings, which may support greater consistency in trend alignment and lower single-event risk compared with the concentrated approach of TSLL. The slightly higher expense ratio of MAGX is offset by broader sector representation that aligns with sustained thematic momentum in technology. TSLL offers cost efficiency and direct leverage to a high-conviction name but carries elevated volatility from its single-stock mandate. Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to MAGX for investors seeking leveraged technology exposure with relatively moderated concentration risk, though both remain suitable only for sophisticated, short-term strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MAGX vs. TSLL commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGX is a StrongBuy and TSLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLL has more net assets: 3.09B vs. MAGX (56.1M). MAGX has a higher annual dividend yield than TSLL: MAGX (-7.364) vs TSLL (-61.149). MAGX was incepted earlier than TSLL: MAGX (2 years) vs TSLL (4 years). TSLL (0.83) has a lower expense ratio than MAGX (0.95).
MAGXTSLLMAGX / TSLL
Gain YTD-7.364-61.14912%
Net Assets56.1M3.09B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.83114%
TurnoverN/A101.00-
Yield2.205.1443%
Fund Existence2 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGXTSLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAGX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SELV34.220.17
+0.50%
SEI QiM U.S. Lrg Cap Low Volatil Act ETF
PBMR32.220.03
+0.10%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Mar
MEMA29.400.02
+0.06%
Man Active Emerging Mkts Alt ETF
BUYO32.65N/A
N/A
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF
MYI10.66-0.08
-0.74%
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III

TSLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLL has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLL jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLL
1D Price
Change %
TSLL100%
+1.39%
TSLA - TSLL
100%
Closely correlated
+0.76%