MAKO
Price
$10.54
Change
+$0.04 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
921.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NG
Price
$8.72
Change
+$0.06 (+0.69%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.83B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAKO vs NG

MAKO vs NG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAKO vs. NG commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAKO is a Hold and NG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MAKO: $10.54 vs. NG: $8.72)
Brand notoriety: MAKO and NG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAKO: 93% vs. NG: 90%
Market capitalization -- MAKO: $921.66M vs. NG: $3.83B
MAKO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $921.66M. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $138.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $15.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAKO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAKO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKO is a better buy in the long-term than NG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAKO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAKO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MAKO and NG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MAKO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.15% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

NG is expected to report earnings on Oct 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NG($3.83B) has a higher market cap than MAKO($922M). MAKO YTD gains are higher at: 81.724 vs. NG (-6.438). MAKO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 87.6M vs. NG (-57.34M). NG has more cash in the bank: 371M vs. MAKO (94M). MAKO has less debt than NG: MAKO (29.2M) vs NG (174M). MAKO has higher revenues than NG: MAKO (185M) vs NG (0).
MAKONGMAKO / NG
Capitalization922M3.83B24%
EBITDA87.6M-57.34M-153%
Gain YTD81.724-6.438-1,269%
P/E Ratio17.85N/A-
Revenue185M0-
Total Cash94M371M25%
Total Debt29.2M174M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAKO vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
MAKO
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
592
SMR RATING
1..100
2897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAKO's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (87) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (92) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (40) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

MAKO's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MAKO’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAKONG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAKO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMITX9.760.11
+1.14%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I3
GINDX37.570.27
+0.72%
Gotham Index Plus Institutional
GIFFX25.710.12
+0.47%
Invesco Growth and Income R6
FEKFX20.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Equity-Income K6
FBCCX303.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth A

MAKO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAKO has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAKO jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKO
1D Price
Change %
MAKO100%
+0.38%
WPM - MAKO
72%
Closely correlated
+5.01%
NG - MAKO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PAAS - MAKO
68%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
FSM - MAKO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
SA - MAKO
67%
Closely correlated
-9.35%
More

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NG jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
+0.69%
AEM - NG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
CGAU - NG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
WPM - NG
81%
Closely correlated
+5.01%
KGC - NG
81%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
SA - NG
80%
Closely correlated
-9.35%
More