MALRF
Price
$25.80
Change
+$3.49 (+15.64%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.43B
MIDLF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.04 (+13.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
38.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MALRF vs MIDLF

Header iconMALRF vs MIDLF Comparison
Open Charts MALRF vs MIDLFBanner chart's image
Mineral Resources
Price$25.80
Change+$3.49 (+15.64%)
Volume$215
Capitalization5.43B
Midland Expl
Price$0.34
Change+$0.04 (+13.33%)
Volume$20.34K
Capitalization38.82M
MALRF vs MIDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MALRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MALRF vs. MIDLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MALRF is a Buy and MIDLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MALRF: $25.80 vs. MIDLF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: MALRF and MIDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MALRF: 53% vs. MIDLF: 48%
Market capitalization -- MALRF: $5.43B vs. MIDLF: $38.82M
MALRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.43B. MIDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $38.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MALRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMIDLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MALRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MIDLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MALRF is a better buy in the long-term than MIDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MALRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIDLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MALRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MIDLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MIDLF is a better buy in the short-term than MALRF.

Price Growth

MALRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.60% price change this week, while MIDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MALRF($5.43B) has a higher market cap than MIDLF($38.8M). MIDLF YTD gains are higher at: 69.401 vs. MALRF (21.654).
MALRFMIDLFMALRF / MIDLF
Capitalization5.43B38.8M13,987%
EBITDAN/A-1.81M-
Gain YTD21.65469.40131%
P/E Ratio23.09N/A-
RevenueN/A151K-
Total CashN/A5.7M-
Total DebtN/A264K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MALRF vs MIDLF: Fundamental Ratings
MALRF
MIDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MALRF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIDLF (77). This means that MALRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MALRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (100). This means that MALRF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MALRF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (93). This means that MALRF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MALRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (48). This means that MALRF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MALRF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (100). This means that MALRF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MALRFMIDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MALRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPGRX20.92N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Fund Class S
NRIAX22.48N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Asset Income A
STLYX40.10N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Large Cap Y (SIMT)
TRACX18.24N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val C
CWMFX65.84-0.38
-0.57%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529F1

MALRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MALRF and PRZFF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MALRF and PRZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MALRF
1D Price
Change %
MALRF100%
N/A
PRZFF - MALRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VDOMF - MALRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRYGF - MALRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPHF - MALRF
16%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
MIDLF - MALRF
14%
Poorly correlated
+14.97%
More

MIDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIDLF and MACQF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIDLF and MACQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIDLF
1D Price
Change %
MIDLF100%
+14.97%
MACQF - MIDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - MIDLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRY - MIDLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
MKRIF - MIDLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
MGPHF - MIDLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
More