Advertisement
MAMA vs NOMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Hold and NOMD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NOMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOMD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NOMD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while NOMD (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.
NOMD is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.11% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| MAMA | NOMD | MAMA / NOMD | |
| Capitalization | 187M | 3.21B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 9.86M | 480M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -1.005 | 3.453 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.24 | 16.07 | 163% |
| Revenue | 96.4M | 3.04B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 5.56M | 413M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 15.2M | 2.15B | 1% |
MAMA | NOMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOMD's Valuation (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (88) in the null industry. This means that NOMD’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOMD (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NOMD (74) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NOMD (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOMD (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than NOMD’s over the last 12 months.
| MAMA | NOMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 17 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 6 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JHPI | 22.50 | 0.04 | +0.18% |
| JHancock Preferred Income ETF | |||
| EDEN | 114.43 | 0.02 | +0.02% |
| iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | |||
| BABO | 15.13 | -0.05 | -0.32% |
| YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| NML | 8.80 | -0.03 | -0.34% |
| Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund | |||
| SIVR | 34.34 | -0.57 | -1.63% |
| abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | |||
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and DAR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| JBSS - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| LWAY - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| NOMD - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| JVA - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||
NOMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOMD has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOMD jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOMD | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| KHC - NOMD | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MKC - NOMD | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| POST - NOMD | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MDLZ - NOMD | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| THS - NOMD | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
More | ||||