MAMA vs USNA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMA is a Hold and USNA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUSNA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MAMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- USNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USNA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- USNA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while USNA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +6.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2024.
USNA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.23% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| MAMA | USNA | MAMA / USNA | |
| Capitalization | 187M | 933M | 20% |
| EBITDA | 9.86M | 123M | 8% |
| Gain YTD | 56.415 | -25.448 | -222% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.24 | 14.53 | 181% |
| Revenue | 96.4M | 921M | 10% |
| Total Cash | 5.56M | 330M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 15.2M | 8.06M | 188% |
MAMA | USNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
USNA's Valuation (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MAMA (92) in the null industry. This means that USNA’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for USNA (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (83) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
| MAMA | USNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and NOMD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and NOMD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | -2.17% | ||
| NOMD - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| FRPT - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| JVA - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.80% | ||
| USNA - MAMA | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.31% | ||
More | ||||
USNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USNA has been loosely correlated with HLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USNA jumps, then HLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USNA | 100% | +4.31% | ||
| HLF - USNA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| CENTA - USNA | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CENT - USNA | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| HAIN - USNA | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| JBSS - USNA | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||