It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
MAS (@Building Products) experienced а -1.40% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.48%.
MAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
MAS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MAS | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 29% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 50% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBCM | 30.64 | 0.24 | +0.81% |
| Neuberger Commodity Stgy ETF | |||
| CPSL | 28.25 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF | |||
| FB | 45.06 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Proshares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF | |||
| XYLD | 41.64 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X S&P 500® Covered Call ETF | |||
| EAOA | 45.88 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Agrsv Allc ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAS has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| BLDR - MAS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| FBIN - MAS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| GFF - MAS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| OC - MAS | 68% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| LII - MAS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDS and TER have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDS and TER's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCDS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| TER - MCDS | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
| AME - MCDS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| WAB - MCDS | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| MAS - MCDS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| HWM - MCDS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||