MAS
Price
$74.27
Change
+$0.68 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jun 23, 11:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.84B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OC
Price
$124.62
Change
-$3.52 (-2.75%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.04B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAS vs OC

MAS vs OC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Masco Corporation (MAS) vs. Owens Corning (OC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Owens Corning (OC) has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at 12.34% compared to Masco Corporation's (MAS) 5.52%.
  • OC shows robust recent momentum with a roughly 16% gain over the past month, outpacing MAS's approximately 10% rise in the same period.
  • Both companies operate in the building products sector, facing similar headwinds from housing market softness but benefiting from recent recovery signals.
  • MAS nears its Q1 2026 earnings release with analysts projecting modest 2.1% revenue growth amid prior misses.
  • OC recently sold its glass unit for $645 million, streamlining its portfolio and supporting positive sentiment shifts.
  • Market capitalizations stand at $13.6 billion for MAS and $10.2 billion for OC, with forward P/E ratios (price-to-earnings) of 15.95 and 12.99, respectively.

Introduction

Masco Corporation (MAS) and Owens Corning (OC) are key players in the building products industry, a cyclical sector tied to housing starts, remodeling activity, and construction trends. This comparison evaluates their relative performance, business drivers, and market positioning amid recent economic shifts, including interest rate dynamics and housing market stabilization. Traders seeking short-term momentum and long-term investors assessing sector resilience will find value in understanding how these peers stack up in the current environment, particularly as both navigate recovery from prior slowdowns.

MAS Overview and Recent Performance

Masco Corporation (MAS) is a leading manufacturer of branded home improvement and building products, including faucets under the Delta brand, paints via Behr, and cabinetry. Operating in the Industrials sector's Building Products & Equipment industry, it benefits from consumer-driven remodeling demand. In recent market activity, MAS shares have traded around $66.68, reflecting YTD gains of 5.52% and a 10.33% rise over the past year. The stock posted a roughly 10% increase over recent weeks, rebounding from earlier post-earnings declines linked to revenue shortfalls and housing weakness. Sentiment has been influenced by broader sector pressures, though upcoming Q1 2026 earnings—forecast at $1.84 billion in revenue, up 2.1% year-over-year—could provide catalysts if results exceed expectations. Key metrics include a trailing P/E ratio of 17.27 and EPS (earnings per share) of $3.86 (TTM), with a beta of 1.29 indicating moderate volatility.

OC Overview and Recent Performance

Owens Corning (OC) specializes in fiberglass reinforcements, composites, insulation, and roofing materials for residential and commercial construction. Like MAS, it resides in the Industrials sector's Building Products & Equipment space, with exposure to infrastructure and energy efficiency trends. Shares recently closed near $123.95, boasting YTD performance of 12.34% and a one-year return of 7.83%. Recent weeks have seen strong momentum, with gains around 16%, though tempered by volatility including a post-outlook dip from doors segment impairments. Positive developments, such as the $645 million sale of its glass unit to streamline operations, have bolstered sentiment. Fundamentals feature a forward P/E of 12.99, market cap of $10.2 billion, and beta of 1.34.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and more. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this section based on AI analysis of current market conditions, showcasing annualized returns ranging from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates of 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as swing trading, trend following, and technical/fundamental analysis—across timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts, targeting sectors from semiconductors to industrials. While neither MAS nor OC features prominently, the platform's virtual, signal, and brokerage agents offer customizable risk management for varied trading styles. Investors can explore these high-potential tools to align with prevailing trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Masco (MAS) emphasizes consumer-branded products for DIY and professional remodeling, contrasting Owens Corning's (OC) focus on industrial materials like insulation and roofing shingles. Growth drivers overlap in housing recovery but diverge: MAS leverages brand loyalty in plumbing/decorative segments, while OC gains from composites in autos and wind energy. Recent momentum favors OC with superior YTD and monthly gains, versus MAS's steadier but lagging rebound. Risk factors include interest-rate sensitivity and construction cyclicality for both, with OC showing higher beta (1.34 vs. 1.29). Sector exposure is identical, but OC's asset sale enhances portfolio efficiency, potentially lifting sentiment over MAS's earnings overhang.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI tools would currently favor OC over MAS, driven by stronger trend consistency in YTD and recent performance, plus catalysts like the glass unit divestiture that signal operational focus. While MAS offers stability ahead of earnings, OC's relative positioning in a recovering sector suggests higher probabilistic upside in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MAS vs. OC commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAS is a StrongBuy and OC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MAS: $73.58 vs. OC: $124.62)
Brand notoriety: MAS: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAS: 62% vs. OC: 76%
Market capitalization -- MAS: $14.84B vs. OC: $10.04B
MAS [@Building Products] is valued at $14.84B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $108.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAS is a better buy in the long-term than OC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the short-term than MAS.

Price Growth

MAS (@Building Products) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

OC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.11% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAS($14.8B) has a higher market cap than OC($10B). MAS has higher P/E ratio than OC: MAS (18.21) vs OC (15.02). MAS YTD gains are higher at: 17.001 vs. OC (12.946). MAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. OC (782M). MAS has more cash in the bank: 388M vs. OC (272M). MAS has less debt than OC: MAS (3.3B) vs OC (6.02B). OC has higher revenues than MAS: OC (9.84B) vs MAS (7.68B).
MASOCMAS / OC
Capitalization14.8B10B148%
EBITDA1.27B782M163%
Gain YTD17.00112.946131%
P/E Ratio18.2115.02121%
Revenue7.68B9.84B78%
Total Cash388M272M143%
Total Debt3.3B6.02B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAS vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
MAS
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6082
SMR RATING
1..100
295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (14) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAS (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew significantly faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (82) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's SMR Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for OC (95) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew significantly faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (43) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

MAS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MASOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMD10.860.22
+2.07%
Viemed Healthcare
FVNNU11.19N/A
N/A
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.
GMED79.19-0.04
-0.05%
Globus Medical
NWN48.70-0.32
-0.65%
Northwest Natural Holding Company
NIPG0.28N/A
-1.42%
NIP Group Inc

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-2.75%
BLDR - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-4.05%
MAS - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
LPX - OC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
TREX - OC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
APOG - OC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
More