Advertisement
MAT vs UNIT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAT is a Hold and UNIT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNIT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UNIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNIT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UNIT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while UNIT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +9.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
UNIT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-0.29% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.82% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| MAT | UNIT | MAT / UNIT | |
| Capitalization | 6.82B | 1.41B | 482% |
| EBITDA | 767M | 642M | 119% |
| Gain YTD | 9.927 | -11.455 | -87% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.81 | 9.13 | 359% |
| Revenue | 5.44B | 1.15B | 473% |
| Total Cash | 1.26B | 62.3M | 2,024% |
| Total Debt | 2.59B | 5.63B | 46% |
MAT | UNIT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UNIT's Valuation (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (85) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that UNIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.
MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNIT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNIT’s over the last 12 months.
MAT's SMR Rating (38) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as UNIT (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to UNIT’s over the last 12 months.
MAT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as UNIT (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to UNIT’s over the last 12 months.
UNIT's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MAT (90) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that UNIT’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.
| MAT | UNIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 76% |
Advertisement
MAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| HAS - MAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| JAKK - MAT | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GOLF - MAT | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| YETI - MAT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| BC - MAT | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||
UNIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNIT has been closely correlated with DBRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNIT jumps, then DBRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UNIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIT | 100% | +4.73% | ||
| DBRG - UNIT | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| OUT - UNIT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| OLP - UNIT | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| RITM - UNIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| AI - UNIT | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||