Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MATFX vs TRZNX
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MATFX vs TRZNX
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 2.55B vs. MATFX (514M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than MATFX: TRZNX (1.25) vs MATFX (0.00). MATFX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MATFX (27 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). MATFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.67 vs. TRZNX (52.90). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MATFX: TRZNX (0) vs MATFX (2500). MATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.31 vs. TRZNX (33.98). TRZNX return over 5 years is better than : 9.21 vs. MATFX (-8.04).
| MATFX | TRZNX | MATFX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.323 | 21.048 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 2.55B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.31 | 33.98 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.03 | 63.86 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.04 | 9.21 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement