Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MATFX vs TRZNX
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MATFX vs TRZNX
MATFX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. MATFX (436M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than MATFX: TRZNX (1.30) vs MATFX (0.00). MATFX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MATFX (27 years) vs TRZNX (6 years). MATFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.67 vs. TRZNX (52.90). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MATFX: TRZNX (0) vs MATFX (2500). MATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.75 vs. TRZNX (31.43). TRZNX return over 5 years is better than : 13.33 vs. MATFX (-8.25).
| MATFX | TRZNX | MATFX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.246 | 25.517 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 2.43B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.75 | 31.43 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.57 | 77.80 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.25 | 13.33 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement