Advertisement
MATW vs RCMT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATW is a StrongBuy and RCMT is a Buy.
MATW | RCMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MATW's Valuation (5) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCMT (73) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that MATW’s stock grew significantly faster than RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MATW (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew significantly faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's SMR Rating (26) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MATW (92) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew significantly faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATW (77) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
MATW's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is in the same range as RCMT (25) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that MATW’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
| MATW | RCMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 63% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MATW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while RCMT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MATW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RCMT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MATW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCMT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MATW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RCMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MATW (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.79% price change this week, while RCMT (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +3.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
MATW is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
RCMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.70% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRAE | 42.06 | 0.43 | +1.04% |
| PlanRock Equity Plus Alternatives ETF (PRAE) | |||
| WCAP | 9.26 | 0.09 | +1.00% |
| WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF (WCAP) | |||
| SCZ | 84.32 | 0.81 | +0.97% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) | |||
| ROCY | 55.11 | 0.37 | +0.68% |
| JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCY) | |||
| SBIO | 56.15 | -0.49 | -0.87% |
| ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) | |||
MATW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATW has been loosely correlated with NWPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATW jumps, then NWPX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATW | 100% | +3.82% | ||
| NWPX - MATW | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| IIIN - MATW | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| MLI - MATW | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| WOR - MATW | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| PRLB - MATW | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
More | ||||
RCMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCMT and VMI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCMT and VMI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCMT | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| VMI - RCMT | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| MEC - RCMT | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.85% | ||
| MATW - RCMT | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.82% | ||
| NWPX - RCMT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| OTTR - RCMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||