Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBAIX vs RLBFX
MBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MBAIX vs RLBFX
MBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBAIX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBAIX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. MBAIX (455M). MBAIX (2.10) and RLBFX (2.05) have matching dividends . MBAIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MBAIX (37 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MBAIX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). MBAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBAIX: RLBFX (250) vs MBAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. MBAIX (10.25). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. MBAIX (3.56).
| MBAIX | RLBFX | MBAIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.912 | 10.287 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 455M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.05 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 12.94 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.56 | 46.32 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.56 | 35.73 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.64 | 86.86 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement