Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBAIX vs RLBFX
MBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MBAIX vs RLBFX
MBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBAIX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBAIX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBAIX (443M). MBAIX (2.08) and RLBFX (2.03) have matching dividends . MBAIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MBAIX (37 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MBAIX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). MBAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBAIX: RLBFX (250) vs MBAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. MBAIX (5.69). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. MBAIX (2.04).
| MBAIX | RLBFX | MBAIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.858 | 8.705 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 2.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 6.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.11 | 42.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.04 | 33.18 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.70 | 87.98 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement